Arrow-3 vs Su-35S Flanker-E: Side-by-Side Comparison & Analysis
Overview
In this side-by-side comparison, we analyze the Arrow-3 exoatmospheric interceptor and the Su-35S Flanker-E 4++ generation air superiority fighter. Both systems serve as critical components in the defense against ballistic missile threats and air superiority missions. This comparison aims to provide defense planners with a comprehensive understanding of each system's strengths and weaknesses, enabling informed decisions for specific scenarios.
Side-by-Side Specifications
| Dimension | Arrow 3 | Su 35 |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 2400 km | 3600 km |
| Speed | Mach 9+ | Mach 2.25 |
| Cost | ~$3M per interceptor | ~$85M per aircraft |
| Guidance | Two-color infrared seeker with mid-course datalink updates from Green Pine radar | Irbis-E PESA radar (400km detection range) |
| Warhead | Hit-to-kill kinetic energy (no explosive warhead) | Up to 8 tons of ordnance on 12 hardpoints |
| First Deployed | 2017 | 2014 |
| Operators | Israel | Russia, China, Egypt, Indonesia (cancelled), Iran (ordered) |
| Altitude | Above 100km | Up to 20km |
| Engagement Time | ~90 seconds | Variable |
| Coverage Area | Extremely wide | Moderate |
Head-to-Head Analysis
Range & Coverage
Accuracy
Cost
Guidance
Warhead
Scenario Analysis
Defending against Iranian ballistic missile salvo
Air superiority mission against Russian air force
Defending against cruise missile attack
Complementary Use
In certain scenarios, the Arrow-3 and Su-35S Flanker-E can work together to provide a more comprehensive defense against ballistic missile threats and air superiority missions. The Arrow-3 can provide exoatmospheric defense, while the Su-35S Flanker-E can provide air superiority and ground attack capabilities.
Overall Verdict
The Arrow-3 and Su-35S Flanker-E are both highly capable systems, but they serve different purposes. The Arrow-3 is better suited for defending against ballistic missile threats, while the Su-35S Flanker-E is better suited for air superiority missions. Defense planners should consider the specific requirements of their mission and choose the system that best meets those needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between the Arrow-3 and Su-35S Flanker-E?
The main difference between the Arrow-3 and Su-35S Flanker-E is their purpose. The Arrow-3 is an exoatmospheric interceptor designed to defend against ballistic missile threats, while the Su-35S Flanker-E is a 4++ generation air superiority fighter designed for air superiority and ground attack missions.
Which system has a longer range?
The Su-35S Flanker-E has a significantly longer range than the Arrow-3, allowing it to engage targets at greater distances.
Which system is more cost-effective?
The Arrow-3 is significantly cheaper than the Su-35S Flanker-E, making it a more cost-effective option for defense planners.
Can the Arrow-3 engage cruise missiles?
No, the Arrow-3 is unable to engage cruise missiles due to its high altitude and limited magazine depth.
Can the Su-35S Flanker-E engage ballistic missiles?
Yes, the Su-35S Flanker-E can engage ballistic missiles, but its effectiveness is limited compared to the Arrow-3's exoatmospheric capabilities.