David's Sling vs Fateh-110: Cost-Exchange Ratio & Combat Analysis
Overview
This analysis compares the David's Sling, a Israel Mid-tier 40-300km system costing $1.0M per unit, against the Fateh-110, an Iranian SRBM costing $300K per unit. The cost-exchange ratio of 3.3:1 favors the attacker — meaning it costs the defender 3.3x more to intercept than the missile cost Iran to produce. Mid-tier defense system with Stunner dual-seeker interceptor for 40-300km threats Solid-fueled SRBM family — Fateh-110/313/360 variants with 300-400km range
Side-by-Side Specifications
| Dimension | David S Sling | Fateh 110 |
|---|---|---|
| Unit Cost | $1.0M | $300K |
| Cost-Exchange Ratio | 3.3:1 | 3.3:1 |
| Range | Mid-tier 40-300km | 400 km |
| Inventory | ~180 | ~500 |
| Annual Production | 50/yr | — |
| Role | Mid-tier 40-300km | SRBM |
| Manufacturer | Rafael + RTX | Iran / IRGC |
| Fuel | Solid rocket | — |
Head-to-Head Analysis
Cost-Exchange Economics
Inventory & Depletion
Tactical Engagement
Scenario Analysis
Mass salvo of Fateh-110 missiles
Extended conflict (30+ days)
Complementary Use
The David's Sling should be integrated into a layered defense architecture, not relied upon as a standalone solution against Fateh-110 threats. Cost-effective lower-tier systems (Iron Dome at $80K, or Iron Beam laser at $2/shot) should handle cheaper threats when possible, preserving expensive David's Sling interceptors for high-value targets.
Overall Verdict
The David's Sling vs Fateh-110 matchup produces a 3.3:1 cost-exchange ratio favoring the attacker. For sustained conflict planning, interceptor production ramp-up and cost-reduction programs are critical to maintaining defensive capability.