Iron Dome vs Shahed-238: Cost-Exchange Ratio & Combat Analysis
Compare
2026-03-21
3 min read
Overview
This analysis compares the Iron Dome, a Israel SHORAD system costing $80K per unit, against the Shahed-238, an Iranian Jet drone costing $75K per unit. The cost-exchange ratio of 1.1:1 favors the attacker — meaning it costs the defender 1.1x more to intercept than the missile cost Iran to produce. At Operation Epic Fury burn rates of 60/day, the Iron Dome inventory of 1800 units faces depletion in approximately 30 days. Short-range rocket/mortar/drone defense system with 90%+ intercept rate Jet-powered attack drone with 2,000km range and 85kg warhead — faster than Shahed-136
Side-by-Side Specifications
| Dimension | Iron Dome | Shahed 238 |
|---|
| Unit Cost |
$80K |
$75K |
| Cost-Exchange Ratio |
1.1:1 |
1.1:1 |
| Range |
SHORAD |
2000 km |
| Inventory |
~1,800 |
~500 |
| Annual Production |
500/yr |
— |
| Role |
SHORAD |
Jet drone |
| Manufacturer |
Rafael |
Iran / IRGC |
| Fuel |
Solid rocket |
— |
Head-to-Head Analysis
Cost-Exchange Economics
The Iron Dome costs $80K per unit while the Shahed-238 costs just $75K, creating a 1.1:1 cost-exchange ratio. Moderately unfavorable for the defender.
The Shahed-238 has a 1.1:1 cost advantage over the Iron Dome. This asymmetry is a key factor in the conflict's economic sustainability.
Inventory & Depletion
Coalition forces have approximately 1,800 Iron Dome interceptors with annual production of 500 units. Iran maintains an estimated 500 Shahed-238 units with high-volume production capacity. At Operation Epic Fury burn rates of 60/day, the Iron Dome inventory of 1800 units faces depletion in approximately 30 days.
Coalition holds an inventory advantage, but at 1.1:1 cost ratio, this is offset by economics.
Tactical Engagement
The Iron Dome engages the Shahed-238 during the flight phase. With 2000km range, the Shahed-238 can be launched from deep within Iranian territory, complicating launch detection. 5,000+ combat intercepts. 90%+ rate.
The Iron Dome is designed to counter threats like the Shahed-238, but sustained engagement at 1.1:1 cost ratios creates long-term sustainability challenges.
Scenario Analysis
Mass salvo of Shahed-238 missiles
In a saturation attack using Shahed-238 systems, the Iron Dome battery would need to engage multiple targets simultaneously. At $80K per interceptor, a salvo of 5 Shahed-238 missiles would cost $375K to launch but $400K to intercept.
Shahed-238
Extended conflict (30+ days)
Over 30 days of sustained combat, the Iron Dome inventory faces significant depletion pressure. Annual production of 500 units translates to just 1.4 per day — far below consumption rates during active operations. Meanwhile, Iran produces approximately 3.3 ballistic missiles and 6.7 drones per day.
Attacker (Iran) — production outpaces defender replenishment
Complementary Use
The Iron Dome should be integrated into a layered defense architecture, not relied upon as a standalone solution against Shahed-238 threats. Cost-effective lower-tier systems (Iron Dome at $80K, or Iron Beam laser at $2/shot) should handle cheaper threats when possible, preserving expensive Iron Dome interceptors for high-value targets.
Overall Verdict
The Iron Dome vs Shahed-238 matchup produces a 1.1:1 cost-exchange ratio favoring the attacker. For sustained conflict planning, interceptor production ramp-up and cost-reduction programs are critical to maintaining defensive capability.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related News & Analysis