English · العربية · فارسی · עברית · Русский · 中文 · Español · Français

Khalij-e Fars vs Noor: Side-by-Side Comparison & Analysis

Compare 2026-03-21 4 min read

Overview

This side-by-side comparison of Khalij-e Fars and Noor highlights the strengths and weaknesses of Iran's anti-ship ballistic missile and conventional anti-ship cruise missile. Defense planners can use this analysis to determine which system is best suited for specific scenarios, such as defending against Iranian ballistic missile salvo or targeting US carrier groups in the Persian Gulf.

Side-by-Side Specifications

DimensionKhalij E FarsNoor
Range (km) 300 170
Speed (Mach) 3+ 0.85
Cost (USD) ~$1-2M ~$500K
Guidance INS + electro-optical terminal seeker Inertial cruise + active radar terminal seeker
Warhead (kg) 450 165
First Deployed 2011 2000
Operators Iran Iran, Hezbollah
Terminal Speed Mach 3+ Subsonic
Range Limitations Gulf theater only Limited for open-ocean scenarios
A2/AD Capability Denies Gulf to surface ships Coastal battery deployment provides overlapping coverage of Hormuz

Head-to-Head Analysis

Range & Coverage

Khalij-e Fars has a significantly longer range than Noor, making it more suitable for targeting ships in the Persian Gulf. However, Noor's shorter range is compensated by its ability to be deployed in larger numbers, providing overlapping coverage of Hormuz.
Khalij-e Fars has a significant advantage in terms of range and coverage, but Noor's deployment strategy can provide effective coverage of Hormuz.

Accuracy

Both systems have demonstrated accuracy in testing, but Khalij-e Fars' electro-optical terminal seeker provides a significant advantage in terms of accuracy against moving targets.
Khalij-e Fars has a significant advantage in terms of accuracy, making it more suitable for targeting high-value assets.

Cost

Noor is significantly cheaper than Khalij-e Fars, making it a more attractive option for large-scale deployments.
Noor has a significant advantage in terms of cost, making it a more attractive option for large-scale deployments.

Guidance

Khalij-e Fars' INS + electro-optical terminal seeker provides a significant advantage in terms of guidance, making it more suitable for targeting moving targets.
Khalij-e Fars has a significant advantage in terms of guidance, making it more suitable for targeting high-value assets.

Warhead

Khalij-e Fars' larger warhead provides a significant advantage in terms of damage potential, making it more suitable for targeting high-value assets.
Khalij-e Fars has a significant advantage in terms of warhead size, making it more suitable for targeting high-value assets.

Scenario Analysis

Defending against Iranian ballistic missile salvo

Khalij-e Fars' ability to penetrate ship defenses and its high terminal speed make it a significant threat in this scenario. Noor's shorter range and subsonic speed make it less effective in this scenario.
Khalij-e Fars

Targeting US carrier groups in the Persian Gulf

Khalij-e Fars' longer range and higher terminal speed make it a significant threat in this scenario. Noor's shorter range and subsonic speed make it less effective in this scenario.
Khalij-e Fars

Defending against a Noor attack

Noor's ability to be deployed in large numbers and its coastal battery deployment strategy make it a significant threat in this scenario. Khalij-e Fars' longer range and higher terminal speed make it a more effective countermeasure.
Khalij-e Fars

Complementary Use

Both Khalij-e Fars and Noor can be used in conjunction with other Iranian military assets to provide a layered defense of the Persian Gulf. Khalij-e Fars can be used to target high-value assets, while Noor can be used to provide overlapping coverage of Hormuz.

Overall Verdict

Khalij-e Fars is a more effective anti-ship ballistic missile than Noor, due to its longer range, higher terminal speed, and larger warhead. However, Noor's lower cost and ability to be deployed in large numbers make it a more attractive option for large-scale deployments. Ultimately, the choice between Khalij-e Fars and Noor will depend on the specific requirements of the mission and the resources available.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between Khalij-e Fars and Noor?

Khalij-e Fars is an anti-ship ballistic missile, while Noor is a conventional anti-ship cruise missile. Khalij-e Fars has a longer range and higher terminal speed, but Noor is cheaper and can be deployed in larger numbers.

Which system is more effective?

Khalij-e Fars is more effective due to its longer range, higher terminal speed, and larger warhead. However, Noor's lower cost and ability to be deployed in large numbers make it a more attractive option for large-scale deployments.

Can Khalij-e Fars and Noor be used together?

Yes, both systems can be used in conjunction with other Iranian military assets to provide a layered defense of the Persian Gulf.

What are the limitations of Noor?

Noor's shorter range and subsonic speed make it less effective in certain scenarios, such as defending against a ballistic missile salvo or targeting US carrier groups in the Persian Gulf.

What are the limitations of Khalij-e Fars?

Khalij-e Fars' longer range and higher terminal speed make it a significant threat, but its higher cost and limited availability make it less attractive for large-scale deployments.

Related

Sources

Jane's Defence Weekly Jane's Information Group official
Defense News Gannett Company journalistic
The Diplomat The Diplomat Media journalistic
GlobalSecurity.org GlobalSecurity.org OSINT

Related Topics

Khalij-e Fars Khalij-e Fars vs Harpoon What Is Sam Site What Is A Ballistic Missile Global Missile Defense Spending PrSM (Precision Strike Missile)

Related News & Analysis