Quds-1 vs Soumar: Side-by-Side Comparison & Analysis
Compare
2026-03-21
4 min read
Overview
This side-by-side comparison of Quds-1 and Soumar aims to provide defense planners with a comprehensive understanding of these two Iranian cruise missiles. By examining their range, speed, cost, and other key characteristics, this analysis will help determine which system is better suited for specific scenarios.
Side-by-Side Specifications
| Dimension | Quds 1 | Soumar |
|---|
| Range |
800 km |
700 km |
| Speed |
Subsonic (~250 km/h) |
Mach 0.7 (subsonic) |
| Cost |
~$20,000-50,000 estimated |
~$1-2M estimated |
| Guidance |
INS/GPS |
INS/GPS with TERCOM |
| Warhead |
30kg conventional |
Conventional (nuclear warhead removed from original Kh-55) |
| First Deployed |
2019 |
2015 |
| Type |
Small turbojet-powered cruise missile |
Ground-launched land-attack cruise missile |
| Origin |
Iran – transferred to Houthis |
Iran – reverse-engineered from Soviet Kh-55 (obtained from Ukraine) |
| Operators |
Houthi / Ansar Allah |
Iran |
| Speed |
Subsonic (~250 km/h) |
Mach 0.7 (subsonic) |
Head-to-Head Analysis
Range & Coverage
While both Quds-1 and Soumar have limited range, Soumar's 700 km range is slightly shorter than Quds-1's 800 km. However, Soumar's terrain-following capability allows it to fly low and avoid detection, making it a better choice for targeting defended areas.
Soumar is better for targeting defended areas due to its terrain-following capability, but Quds-1 has a longer range.
Accuracy
Both Quds-1 and Soumar have limited accuracy, but Soumar's INS/GPS with TERCOM guidance system provides better accuracy than Quds-1's INS/GPS. However, Quds-1's smaller size and lower cost make it a more attractive option for targeting undefended areas.
Soumar is better for targeting defended areas due to its improved guidance system, but Quds-1 is better for targeting undefended areas due to its smaller size and lower cost.
Cost
Quds-1 is significantly cheaper than Soumar, with an estimated cost of $20,000-50,000 compared to Soumar's $1-2M. This makes Quds-1 a more attractive option for countries or organizations with limited budgets.
Quds-1 is better for countries or organizations with limited budgets due to its significantly lower cost.
Guidance
Soumar's INS/GPS with TERCOM guidance system provides better accuracy and reliability than Quds-1's INS/GPS. However, Quds-1's smaller size and lower cost make it a more attractive option for targeting undefended areas.
Soumar is better for targeting defended areas due to its improved guidance system, but Quds-1 is better for targeting undefended areas due to its smaller size and lower cost.
Warhead
Soumar's conventional warhead is larger than Quds-1's 30kg warhead. However, Quds-1's smaller size and lower cost make it a more attractive option for targeting undefended areas.
Soumar is better for targeting defended areas due to its larger warhead, but Quds-1 is better for targeting undefended areas due to its smaller size and lower cost.
Scenario Analysis
Defending against Iranian ballistic missile salvo
In this scenario, Soumar's terrain-following capability and improved guidance system make it a better choice for targeting defended areas. However, Quds-1's smaller size and lower cost make it a more attractive option for targeting undefended areas.
Soumar
Targeting undefended areas
In this scenario, Quds-1's smaller size and lower cost make it a better choice for targeting undefended areas. However, Soumar's improved guidance system and larger warhead make it a better option for targeting defended areas.
Quds-1
Targeting defended areas
In this scenario, Soumar's terrain-following capability and improved guidance system make it a better choice for targeting defended areas. However, Quds-1's smaller size and lower cost make it a more attractive option for targeting undefended areas.
Soumar
Complementary Use
Quds-1 and Soumar can be used together to target both defended and undefended areas. Quds-1 can be used to target undefended areas, while Soumar can be used to target defended areas. This complementary use of both systems can provide a more effective and comprehensive defense against a wide range of threats.
Overall Verdict
In conclusion, Soumar is a better choice for targeting defended areas due to its terrain-following capability and improved guidance system. However, Quds-1 is a better option for targeting undefended areas due to its smaller size and lower cost. Ultimately, the choice between Quds-1 and Soumar depends on the specific requirements and constraints of the mission.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the range of Quds-1?
Quds-1 has a range of 800 km. However, its smaller size and lower cost make it a more attractive option for targeting undefended areas.
What is the guidance system of Soumar?
Soumar's guidance system is INS/GPS with TERCOM, which provides better accuracy and reliability than Quds-1's INS/GPS.
What is the warhead of Quds-1?
Quds-1's warhead is 30kg conventional.
What is the cost of Soumar?
Soumar's estimated cost is $1-2M.
Can Quds-1 and Soumar be used together?
Yes, Quds-1 and Soumar can be used together to target both defended and undefended areas.
Related
Sources
Jane's Defence Weekly
Jane's Information Group
official
Defense News
Gannett Company
journalistic
The Diplomat
The Diplomat Media
journalistic
IHS Jane's
IHS Markit
academic
Related News & Analysis