English · العربية · فارسی · עברית · Русский · 中文 · Español · Français

SM-6 Blk I/IA vs Ghadr-110: Cost-Exchange Ratio & Combat Analysis

Compare 2026-03-21 3 min read

Overview

This analysis compares the SM-6 Blk I/IA, a US Multi-role BMD/AAW system costing $4.9M per unit, against the Ghadr-110, an Iranian Extended Shahab costing $850K per unit. The cost-exchange ratio of 5.8:1 favors the attacker — meaning it costs the defender 5.8x more to intercept than the missile cost Iran to produce. At Operation Epic Fury burn rates of 6/day, the SM-6 Blk I/IA inventory of 750 units faces depletion in approximately 125 days. Multi-mission missile: anti-air warfare, ballistic missile defense, and anti-surface strike Extended-range Shahab-3 derivative with improved guidance, 2,000km range

Side-by-Side Specifications

DimensionSm 6 Blk I IaGhadr 110
Unit Cost $4.9M $850K
Cost-Exchange Ratio 5.8:1 5.8:1
Range Multi-role BMD/AAW 2000 km
Inventory ~750 ~300
Annual Production 165/yr
Role Multi-role BMD/AAW Extended Shahab
Manufacturer RTX/Raytheon Iran / IRGC
Fuel Solid rocket

Head-to-Head Analysis

Cost-Exchange Economics

The SM-6 Blk I/IA costs $4.9M per unit while the Ghadr-110 costs just $850K, creating a 5.8:1 cost-exchange ratio. Unfavorable for the defender. The attacker has significant cost advantage. Iran can produce 5 Ghadr-110 units for the price of a single SM-6 Blk I/IA interceptor.
The Ghadr-110 has a 5.8:1 cost advantage over the SM-6 Blk I/IA. This asymmetry is a key factor in the conflict's economic sustainability.

Inventory & Depletion

Coalition forces have approximately 750 SM-6 Blk I/IA interceptors with annual production of 165 units. Iran maintains an estimated 300 Ghadr-110 units. The SM-6 Blk I/IA is already 17% depleted vs operational requirements. At Operation Epic Fury burn rates of 6/day, the SM-6 Blk I/IA inventory of 750 units faces depletion in approximately 125 days.
Coalition holds an inventory advantage, but at 5.8:1 cost ratio, this is offset by economics.

Tactical Engagement

The SM-6 Blk I/IA engages the Ghadr-110 during the flight phase. With 2000km range, the Ghadr-110 can be launched from deep within Iranian territory, complicating launch detection. Triple mission. 200+ fired in Red Sea ops. Only dual AAW+BMD.
The SM-6 Blk I/IA is designed to counter threats like the Ghadr-110, but sustained engagement at 5.8:1 cost ratios creates long-term sustainability challenges.

Scenario Analysis

Mass salvo of Ghadr-110 missiles

In a saturation attack using Ghadr-110 systems, the SM-6 Blk I/IA battery would need to engage multiple targets simultaneously. At $4.9M per interceptor, a salvo of 3 Ghadr-110 missiles would cost $2.5M to launch but $14.7M to intercept.
Ghadr-110

Extended conflict (30+ days)

Over 30 days of sustained combat, the SM-6 Blk I/IA inventory faces significant depletion pressure. Annual production of 165 units translates to just 0.5 per day — far below consumption rates during active operations. Meanwhile, Iran produces approximately 3.3 ballistic missiles and 6.7 drones per day.
Attacker (Iran) — production outpaces defender replenishment

Complementary Use

The SM-6 Blk I/IA should be integrated into a layered defense architecture, not relied upon as a standalone solution against Ghadr-110 threats. Cost-effective lower-tier systems (Iron Dome at $80K, or Iron Beam laser at $2/shot) should handle cheaper threats when possible, preserving expensive SM-6 Blk I/IA interceptors for high-value targets.

Overall Verdict

The SM-6 Blk I/IA vs Ghadr-110 matchup produces a 5.8:1 cost-exchange ratio favoring the attacker. For sustained conflict planning, interceptor production ramp-up and cost-reduction programs are critical to maintaining defensive capability.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Topics

Iron Dome vs Ghadr-110 Arrow 2 vs Ghadr-110 Arrow 3 vs Ghadr-110 David's Sling vs Ghadr-110 Iron Dome vs Shahab-3 PAC-3 CRI vs Ghadr-110

Related News & Analysis